'He who seeks to terrify others is more in fear himself' John Clarke,1639
I've been thinking about this state of terror we are being exhorted into.
Qui Bono (who benefits) ? The old legal adage is aposite to the world in which we find ourselves.
Today the death of a Russian spy in England occupied the British media. Analysis of the situation has been given, with an excruciating lack of oversight. Minutiae of scientific explanations have led reporters to completely miss the main question about the death of Alexander Litvinenko: who benefits from this sudden public health scare?
Neither the Russian security service (FSB) nor Putin stand to gain anything from this very public assassination. Given what is now made public about the isotope polonium-210 being the cause of death, it remains to examine who has the ability to a) manufacture and b) administer such a drug.
It had to be under the control of a government, and if not the Russian government, then which? Israel and America have been experimenting with drugs as weapons and it would not be beyond reason to suspect that the 'war on turr' benefits from this public adminstration of a lethal chemical.
Oh Tony, thank you for saving us from such fearful things. Please take away more of our freedom and self respect so that you can continue, until we are all so scared of each other that we beg Big Brother for more.
- Posted by madderbat on 25/11/2006.
- madderbat's site
Please sign in or join etribes to add comments.
